Home > Other news > Parliament standing commitee recommends one of NFHS argument wrt DPA rules

Parliament standing commitee recommends one of NFHS argument wrt DPA rules

NEW DELHI: Planning to get married, or want to get your marriage registered?

First, declare in writing that you didn’t ask or give dowry.

The committee on petitions under the chairmanship of MP Bhagat Singh on Wednesday presented its report to the Rajya Sabha on the dire need to curb female feticide. The panel has recommended that that the registration of marriage must be made mandatory and “undertaking from both the parties should be maintained at that time that no dowry has been exchanged between those parties”. The committee said it “understands that publicity of high expenses on marriages of rich people have cascading effects on the psyche of middle-class and lower-middle class citizens of the country.”

The report, therefore, recommended to the ministries to find ways and means to regulate high expenses for the wedding ceremony. “The evil of dowry is one of the vital causes leading to low status of girl child in the society. Unfortunately, the practice of dowry is still prevalent. The committee is unhappy that this law enacted in 1961 has been unable to check the evil of dowry in the society.”

It added, “The committee, accordingly, recommends that government should take immediate steps to review the toothless Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and ensure that it prescribes some mandatory obligations in the form of disclosures/joint declarations on the parties to the marriage (on both sides) so that they remain conscious and bound socially and legally to their resolves/declaration of not having asked for/given any dowry in marriage.”

As per the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) data, there has been an increase in cases of dowry registered under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, from 3,204 in 2005 to 5,650 in 2009.

The existing definition of ‘dowry’ under the Act is limited in its scope and does not distinguish between ‘gifts’ that are exchanged voluntarily and ‘dowry’ that involves an element of coercion, the report said.

“While the Rules to the Act provide for registration of gifts, but, in the absence of a mechanism for authentication of such gifts, there is nothing to prevent its abuse/misuse. In the opinion of the ministry of women and child development, the scope and coverage of the law needs to be expanded, based on a better understanding of how the system of dowry operates in the current social context. There is also a need for stricter penalties under the law to serve as deterrence to demanding dowry,” it added.

The government is considering making amendments to the Act. Some of the areas which are being looked at are strengthening the definition of “dowry”, making a specific provision on ‘gifts’ and their authentication, increasing penalties for ‘taking and demanding dowry’ to increase the law’s deterrent effect and strengthening role of functionaries under the law.

Dowry deaths under Section 304B of IPC has also increased by 2.6% in 2009 (8,383) as compared to 2008 (8,172), says NCRB record, 2009.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Marriages-may-soon-need-no-dowry-undertaking/articleshow/9726131.cms

 

————————————————–

NFHS Presentation point no8:

————————————————–

1.   Marriage registration should be made compulsory: Compliance to the rules pertaining to Dowry Prohibition Act must be made mandatory even during marriage registration. In absence of marriage certificate, no complaints under section 498A should be entertained. This is important because exorbitant claims are made that huge sum of cash was given as dowry without any proof or evidence. If Dowry Prohibition Act rules regarding maintenance of lists are followed during marriage registration, we can significantly reduce complaints with false claims later on. Also, this will significantly help in curbing the custom of Dowry as it will be impossible for anybody to give or take dowry. A Dowry prohibition officer must be assigned to file an affidavit to the court with proof and evidence of the claims of the wife regarding the dowry exchange before entertaining an FIR containing claims of dowry demanded or having given and taken. In case dowry was given by the complainant wife, according to section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act, even giving dowry is a crime and so, a case should be registered by the police against those who have given dowry. Only then the custom of dowry can actually be brought to an end.

Advertisements
Categories: Other news
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: