<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>***Fighting Gender biased laws** **www.family-harmony.org*** *National Family Harmony Society* 498A HelpLine 9880141531</title>
	<atom:link href="http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>498A</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='498amisuse.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="***Fighting Gender biased laws** **www.family-harmony.org*** *National Family Harmony Society* 498A HelpLine 9880141531" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoned by family, 69-year-old man sues them all for compensation</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/abandoned-by-family-69-year-old-man-sues-them-all-for-compensation/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/abandoned-by-family-69-year-old-man-sues-them-all-for-compensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; A 69-year-old man, who has been allegedly thrown out by his wife and children from their house in Mumbai, has filed a plea in a Surat family court seeking monthly compensation from them. The court has ordered his wife and three children to be present before it on March 1, the next date of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5208&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/abandoned-by-family-69-year-old-man-sues-them-all-for-compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Husband, father-in-law acquitted of dowry death</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/husband-father-in-law-acquitted-of-dowry-death/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/husband-father-in-law-acquitted-of-dowry-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A panchkula court, on Thursday, acquitted Anil Kumar and his father Sheesh Pal, a resident of Hongal, Barwala on charges of dowry death under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code. The defence counsel in the case, Anirudh Kush had pleaded that Anil’s wife, Sushma Devi, had committed suicide by hanging herself and the duo [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5205&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/husband-father-in-law-acquitted-of-dowry-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFHS Press coverage in Times of India Kanada &#8211; Vijaya Next</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/20/nfhs-press-coverage-in-times-of-india-kanada-vijaya-next/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/20/nfhs-press-coverage-in-times-of-india-kanada-vijaya-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press_Coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have translated the last statement: There is a story from Shivakumar. Well done shivakumar Dowry, divorce and family related laws are misused. Even police system are also supporting women in this matter. Said P Suresh, President, National Family Harmony Society pdf &#8211;&#62; Timesofindia_vijaya_next &#160;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5197&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/20/nfhs-press-coverage-in-times-of-india-kanada-vijaya-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/suresh-copy.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">suresh - Copy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If order of maintenance is passed under section 18 HAMA or section 125 Cr.PC then wife can file for divorce under section 13(2)(iii)</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/if-order-of-maintenance-is-passed-under-section-18-hama-or-section-125-cr-pc-then-wife-can-file-for-divorce-under-section-132iii/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/if-order-of-maintenance-is-passed-under-section-18-hama-or-section-125-cr-pc-then-wife-can-file-for-divorce-under-section-132iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Satinder Singh vs Bhupinder Kaur on 2 November, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT APP. No.20/2011 &#38; CM No. 5645/2011 Judgment delivered on: 02 November, 2011 Satinder Singh &#8230;&#8230;Petitioner Through: Mr. Hari Shankar, Adv. Vs. Bhupinder Kaur &#8230;&#8230;Respondent Through: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Adv. CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5192&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/if-order-of-maintenance-is-passed-under-section-18-hama-or-section-125-cr-pc-then-wife-can-file-for-divorce-under-section-132iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Permanent alimony granted during Divorce? No further maintenance in CrPC 125</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/permanent-alimony-granted-during-divorce-no-further-maintenance-in-crpc-125/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/permanent-alimony-granted-during-divorce-no-further-maintenance-in-crpc-125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Anita vs Rati Ram Chauhan on 4 November, 2011 Author: Mukta Gupta * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Rev. P. 726/2010 &#38; Crl. M.A. 17479/2011 % Reserved on: 8th August, 2011 Decided on: 4th November, 2011 ANITA &#8230;.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Advocate versus RATI [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5190&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/permanent-alimony-granted-during-divorce-no-further-maintenance-in-crpc-125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of revolution 2020</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/review-of-revolution-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/review-of-revolution-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review of revolution 2020  Just finished reading novel Revolution 2020. Since the book has already sold millions of copies hence my review is irrelevant. I don’t think Chetan will at all to even have a look what is my review but I need to be honest whether he likes it or not. Revolution 2020 consists [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5184&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/review-of-revolution-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed SC_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-sc_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-sc_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Equivalent citations: AIR 1999 SC 536, 1999 CriLJ 466, JT 1998 (9) SC 473 Bench: S Bharucha, F Uddin Sudeep Chaudhary vs Radha Chaudhary on 31/1/1997 JUDGMENT S.P. Bharucha, J. 1. Special leave granted. 2. The respondent-wife has been served by substituted service but does not appear. 3. The appellant-husband and the respondent-wife are estranged. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5180&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-sc_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Panjab_and_Haryana_3</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_3/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.4813 OF 2009 (O&#38;M) DECIDED ON : 25.08.2009 Raman Ahuja @ Banti …Petitioner versus Vandana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5178&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Panjab_and_Haryana_2</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_2/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &#38; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5775 of 2008 Date of decision : January 20, 2010 Smt. Sonia ….Petitioner versus Om Parkash ….Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. GP Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. JS Saneta, Advocate, for the respondent L.N. Mittal, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5176&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Panjab_and_Haryana_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil Revision No. 2427 of 2009 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2427 of 2009 Date of decision : 23.2.2010 Gian Chand ….Petitioner Versus Dilpreet Kaur …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. G.P.S.Bal, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5172&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-panjab_and_haryana_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Mumbai_HC</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-mumbai_hc/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-mumbai_hc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Equivalent citations: 1992 CriLJ 1845 Bench: B Wahane Ravindra Haribhau Karmarkar vs Mrs. Shaila Ravindra Karmarkar And Another on 17/7/1991 JUDGMENT 1. In the instant application, the substantial question of law, in the public interest, has been raised and enquires decision from this Court. The substantial question of law raised is as [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5170&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-mumbai_hc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Gujrat_HC_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-gujrat_hc_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-gujrat_hc_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCR.A/2080/2010 2/2 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2080 of 2010 ========================================================= HEMLATABEN MAHESHBHAI CHAUHAN – Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &#38; 1 – Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR HEMANT B RAVAL for Applicant(s) : 1, MR KARTIK PANDYA ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, None for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5168&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-gujrat_hc_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Delhi_HC_2</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-delhi_hc_2/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-delhi_hc_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: August 25, 2010 Date of Order: 30th August, 2010 Crl.M.C.No. 130/2010 &#38; Crl.M.A.No. 504/2010 % 30.8.2010 Rachna Kathuria &#8230; Petitioner Through: Mr. P.Narula, Advocate Versus Ramesh Kathuria &#8230; Respondent Through:Mr. S.S.Saluja, Advocate JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA 1. Whether reporters of local papers [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5166&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-delhi_hc_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Citation Compilations Delhi_HC_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-citation-compilations-delhi_hc_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-citation-compilations-delhi_hc_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 22nd September, 2010 Date of Order: September 27, 2010 CRL. R.P. No. 633 of 2010, CRL. M.A. NO. 15451/2010 % 27.09.2010 RENU MITTAL … Petitioner Through: Mr Shiv Charan Garg with Mr. Imran Kha, Advs. Versus ANIL MITTAL &#38; ORS. … Respondents Through: [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5163&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-citation-compilations-delhi_hc_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Calcutta_HC_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-calcutta_hc_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-calcutta_hc_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[03.04.09 C.O. No.3925 of 2008 Anutosh Datta Versus Manasi Datta @ Sona Mr. Jiban Ratan Chatterjee Mr. T. N. Halder .For the petitioner Mr. Sanat Chowdhury For the O.P. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the order dated 18th December, 2006 and order dated 30th [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5160&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-calcutta_hc_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple maintenance not allowed Bihar_HC_1</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-bihar_hc_1/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-bihar_hc_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Equivalent citations: I (2001) DMC 6 Bench: S Mishra Sandhya Kumari vs State Of Bihar on 7/2/2000 JUDGMENT S.N. Mishra, J. 1. In this criminal revision application the petitioner has prayed for setting aisde the order dated 9.8.1999 passed by the learned Magistrate whereby he has rejected the prayer for maintenance in terms of Section [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5157&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/multiple-maintenance-not-allowed-bihar_hc_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello Supreme Court? 16 Lakhs for withdrawing 498A!! What are the charges to get relief in Murder case!!</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hello-supreme-court-16-lakhs-for-withdrawing-498a-what-are-the-charges-to-get-relief-in-murder-case/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hello-supreme-court-16-lakhs-for-withdrawing-498a-what-are-the-charges-to-get-relief-in-murder-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[498A Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Devendra Kumar Sharma vs Bhavna Sharma on 10 October, 2011 Bench: Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8535 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.18439/2007) DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA Appellant(s) :VERSUS: BHAVNA SHARMA Respondent(s) O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard the learned [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5153&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hello-supreme-court-16-lakhs-for-withdrawing-498a-what-are-the-charges-to-get-relief-in-murder-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC Directed parties to file mutual consent divorce within 15 days but parties still fighting it out!!</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hc-directed-parties-to-file-mutual-consent-divorce-within-15-days-but-parties-still-fighting-it-out/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hc-directed-parties-to-file-mutual-consent-divorce-within-15-days-but-parties-still-fighting-it-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Deepti Bhandari vs Nitin Bhandari &#38; Anr on 14 December, 2011 Author: A Kabir Bench: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar, J. Chelameswar REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.5213 Of 2010 Deepti Bhandari &#8230; Petitioner Vs. Nitin Bhandari &#38;amp; Anr. &#8230; Respondents WITH [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5149&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/hc-directed-parties-to-file-mutual-consent-divorce-within-15-days-but-parties-still-fighting-it-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC acknowledges that criticism of IPC 497(Adultry) is fair&#8230;Quashes case against all accused</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/sc-acknowledges-that-criticism-of-ipc-497adultry-is-fair-quashes-case-against-all-accused/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/sc-acknowledges-that-criticism-of-ipc-497adultry-is-fair-quashes-case-against-all-accused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[498A Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W.Kalyani vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police &#38; Anr. on 1 December, 2011 Author: A Alam Bench: Aftab Alam, R.M. Lodha IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2232 OF 2011 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO.648 OF 2010) W.KALYANI &#8230;.APPELLANT VERSUS STATE TR.INSPECTOR OF POLICE &#38;amp; ANR. &#8230;RESPONDENTS WITH SPECIAL LEAVE [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5146&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/sc-acknowledges-that-criticism-of-ipc-497adultry-is-fair-quashes-case-against-all-accused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vinu, I am getting married</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/vinu-i-am-getting-married/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/vinu-i-am-getting-married/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://vmishra.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/about-vinu-i-am-getting-married/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vinu-I-am-getting-Married-Fiction/246563602043433   Kindly request all the visitors of the blog to visit the above facebook page and like the page     Where to buy the book?   It is currently being sold all across India (In big cities) through various outlets like Time Out, Oxford, Crosswords and smaller book stores. Book launch was [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5125&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/vinu-i-am-getting-married/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/vinu_coverspread-for-mail.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Vinu_coverspread FOR MAIL</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/veenu_i-am-getting-married2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">veenu_i am getting married</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/news-cut-of-vineet-mishra-in-the-afternoon-dc-dated-18th-jan1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">News Cut of Vineet Mishra in the Afternoon D&#38;C dated 18th Jan.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/vineet-mishra-freepressjournal-25th-december-2011-page5-copy.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Vineet Mishra-FreePressJournal-25th December 2011-page5 copy</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/article-published-in-prahaar-21st-nov-2011-pg-12.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Article Published in Prahaar 21st Nov. 2011 pg 12....</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/untitled-1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Untitled-1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>it is open for the police to conduct proper investigation, even after the Court took cognizance of any offence on the strength of a police report earlier submitted</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/it-is-open-for-the-police-to-conduct-proper-investigation-even-after-the-court-took-cognizance-of-any-offence-on-the-strength-of-a-police-report-earlier-submitted/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/it-is-open-for-the-police-to-conduct-proper-investigation-even-after-the-court-took-cognizance-of-any-offence-on-the-strength-of-a-police-report-earlier-submitted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/807077/ Mustakali Mahmedbhai Shaikh And &#8230; vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 15 March, 2007 Equivalent citations: (2008) 1 GLR 140 Author: D Waghela Bench: D Waghela JUDGMENT D.H. Waghela, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the rejection of their application by order dated 15-2-2005 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana in Sessions Cases [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5121&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/it-is-open-for-the-police-to-conduct-proper-investigation-even-after-the-court-took-cognizance-of-any-offence-on-the-strength-of-a-police-report-earlier-submitted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>the powers of the police to further investigate under Section 173(8), are unfettered and when trial is proceeding, police may inform concerned Court about further investigation, but no Court can direct such investigation under Section 173(8), after taking cognizance upon the police report</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/the-powers-of-the-police-to-further-investigate-under-section-1738-are-unfettered-and-when-trial-is-proceeding-police-may-inform-concerned-court-about-further-investigation-but-no-court-can-direc/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/the-powers-of-the-police-to-further-investigate-under-section-1738-are-unfettered-and-when-trial-is-proceeding-police-may-inform-concerned-court-about-further-investigation-but-no-court-can-direc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1023986/ Miteshkumar Rameshbhai Patel And &#8230; vs State Of Gujarat And Anr. on 23 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 3198, (2006) 3 GLR 1935 Author: J Vora Bench: J Vora JUDGMENT J.R. Vora, J. 1. At the admission stage, since submissions made at length, the matter was heard finally and learned counsels also agreed [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5119&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/the-powers-of-the-police-to-further-investigate-under-section-1738-are-unfettered-and-when-trial-is-proceeding-police-may-inform-concerned-court-about-further-investigation-but-no-court-can-direc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Under sub-section (2) and sub- section (8) of Section 173, even after submission of police report under sub-section (2) on completion of investigation, the police has a right to &#8220;further&#8221; investigation under sub-section (8) of Section 173 but not &#8220;fresh investigation&#8221; or &#8220;reinvestigation&#8221;. The meaning of &#8220;Further&#8221; is additional; more; or supplemental.</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-under-sub-section-2-and-sub-section-8-of-section-173-even-after-submission-of-police-report-under-sub-section-2-on-completion-of-investigation-the-police-has-a-right-to-further-invest/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-under-sub-section-2-and-sub-section-8-of-section-173-even-after-submission-of-police-report-under-sub-section-2-on-completion-of-investigation-the-police-has-a-right-to-further-invest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/629979/ Java Singh vs Cbi on 6 May, 2009 Author: Reva Khetrapal REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF RESERVE: April 22, 2009 DATE OF DECISION: May 6, 2009 + CRL.M.C. 2525/2008 and CRL. M.A. 9326/2008 JAVA SINGH &#8230;.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5117&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-under-sub-section-2-and-sub-section-8-of-section-173-even-after-submission-of-police-report-under-sub-section-2-on-completion-of-investigation-the-police-has-a-right-to-further-invest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Further investigation can be ordered if there is additional information</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-can-be-ordered-if-there-is-additional-information/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-can-be-ordered-if-there-is-additional-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/799818/ S.N. Dube vs N.B. Bhoir &#38; Ors on 12 January, 2000 Author: Q Nanavatt. Bench: G.T.Nanavati, S.P.Kurdukar PETITIONER: S.N. DUBE Vs. RESPONDENT: N.B. BHOIR &#38; ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/01/2000 BENCH: G.T.Nanavati, S.P.Kurdukar JUDGMENT: Q.T. NANAVATT. J. 1. One Suresh Dube was shot dead on a platform of Nalasopara (a suburb of Bombay) Railway [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5115&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-can-be-ordered-if-there-is-additional-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Further investigation can be ordered to arrive at truth, to cure defective investigation, when fresh facts comes to light&#8230;further investigation is not altogether ruled out merely because cognizance has been taken by the Court&#8230;The mere fact that there may be further delay in concluding the trial should not stand on the way of further investigation</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-further-investigation-can-be-ordered-to-arrive-at-truth-to-cure-defective-investigation-when-fresh-facts-comes-to-light-further-investigation-is-not-altogether-ruled-out-merely-because-cogniza/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-further-investigation-can-be-ordered-to-arrive-at-truth-to-cure-defective-investigation-when-fresh-facts-comes-to-light-further-investigation-is-not-altogether-ruled-out-merely-because-cogniza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1445805/ Hasanbhai Valibhai Qureshi vs State Of Gujarat And Ors on 5 April, 2004 Author: J Arijit Pasayat Bench: D Raju, A Pasayat. CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 421 of 2004 PETITIONER: Hasanbhai Valibhai Qureshi RESPONDENT: State of Gujarat and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/04/2004 BENCH: DORAISWAMY RAJU &#38; ARIJIT PASAYAT. JUDGMENT: J U D G [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5112&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-further-investigation-can-be-ordered-to-arrive-at-truth-to-cure-defective-investigation-when-fresh-facts-comes-to-light-further-investigation-is-not-altogether-ruled-out-merely-because-cogniza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: CBI directed to do further investigation to instill confidence in the public mind  as the offence is grave</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-cbi-directed-to-do-further-investigation-to-instill-confidence-in-the-public-mind-as-the-offence-is-grave/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-cbi-directed-to-do-further-investigation-to-instill-confidence-in-the-public-mind-as-the-offence-is-grave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1143743/ Gudalure M.J. Cherian And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 9 December, 1991 Equivalent citations: 1992 (1) Crimes 2 SC, JT 1991 (4) SC 535 Author: K Singh Bench: K Singh, M F Beevi JUDGMENT JUDGMENT Kuldip Singh, J. 1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5110&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-cbi-directed-to-do-further-investigation-to-instill-confidence-in-the-public-mind-as-the-offence-is-grave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: The prayer for further investigation is rejected, However, the investigating authority shall conduct Brain Mapping/Brain Finger Printing Test of the petitioner-accused</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-the-prayer-for-further-investigation-is-rejected-however-the-investigating-authority-shall-conduct-brain-mappingbrain-finger-printing-test-of-the-petitioner-accused/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-the-prayer-for-further-investigation-is-rejected-however-the-investigating-authority-shall-conduct-brain-mappingbrain-finger-printing-test-of-the-petitioner-accused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1702244/ Dr. Purshottam Swaroopchand Soni vs The State Of Gujarat on 5 April, 2007 Equivalent citations: (2007) 2 GLR 2088 Author: K Jhaveri Bench: K Jhaveri JUDGMENT K.S. Jhaveri, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the judgement and order dated 3rd June 2006 passed below Exhibit 41 in Sessions Case [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5106&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/sc-the-prayer-for-further-investigation-is-rejected-however-the-investigating-authority-shall-conduct-brain-mappingbrain-finger-printing-test-of-the-petitioner-accused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Further investigation: SC rejects further investigation saying 47 witnesses are already examined</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-sc-rejects-further-investigation-saying-47-witnesses-are-already-examined/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-sc-rejects-further-investigation-saying-47-witnesses-are-already-examined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[further investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1090962/ Sasi Thomas vs State &#38; Ors on 24 November, 2006 Author: S Sinha Bench: S Sinha, Mark, E Katju CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 1211 of 2006 PETITIONER: Sasi Thomas RESPONDENT: State &#38; Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/11/2006 BENCH: S.B. Sinha &#38; Markandey Katju JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5102&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/further-investigation-sc-rejects-further-investigation-saying-47-witnesses-are-already-examined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father lost custody in HC because is only X passed and he has also to lookafter a child born out of his second wife, maternal-grand-father gets custody</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/father-lost-custody-in-hc-because-is-only-x-passed-and-he-has-also-to-lookafter-a-child-born-out-of-his-second-wife-maternal-grand-father-gets-custody/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/father-lost-custody-in-hc-because-is-only-x-passed-and-he-has-also-to-lookafter-a-child-born-out-of-his-second-wife-maternal-grand-father-gets-custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haresh vs Bhikhubhai on 18 October, 2011 Author: Jayant Patel, R.M.Chhaya, Gujarat High Court Case Information System  Print http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1250403/  FA/2991/2011 4/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 2991 of 2011 ========================================================= HARESH @ HARSUKH JAYANTI SOLANKI &#8211; Appellant(s) Versus BHIKHUBHAI DEVSIBHAI PARMAR &#8211; Defendant(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5092&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/father-lost-custody-in-hc-because-is-only-x-passed-and-he-has-also-to-lookafter-a-child-born-out-of-his-second-wife-maternal-grand-father-gets-custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC: Wife can claim maintenance from two husbands !!!</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/karnataka-hc-wife-can-claim-maintenance-from-two-husbands/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/karnataka-hc-wife-can-claim-maintenance-from-two-husbands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One alimony no bar to a woman getting another Husband’s counsel tells court that estranged wife is already getting alimony from another ex-husband. Judge retorts: “What is your problem if he is paying? You too will have to pay”   S Shyam Prasad Posted On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 at 04:43:28 AM   A man [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5089&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/karnataka-hc-wife-can-claim-maintenance-from-two-husbands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/spacer.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/stars/greystar.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/stars/greystar.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/stars/greystar.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/stars/greystar.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://www.bangaloremirror.com/images/stars/greystar.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://cms.mumbaimirror.com/portalfiles/22/1/201110/Image/court.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Husband lost appeal in CIC under RTI for disclosing info of wife account in DV Case</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/husband-lost-appeal-in-cic-under-rti-for-disclosing-info-of-wife-account-in-dv-case/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/husband-lost-appeal-in-cic-under-rti-for-disclosing-info-of-wife-account-in-dv-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr.Shabeer Ahmed Sayeed vs Oriental Bank Of Commerce on 29 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office), Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000915/SG/14935 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000915SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Shabeer Ahmed Sayeed, B2/T2, Rohini Garden Enclave, Pattabiraman, Pillai street, Teennnur, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5086&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/husband-lost-appeal-in-cic-under-rti-for-disclosing-info-of-wife-account-in-dv-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man acquitted in rape case must pay for kid</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/man-acquitted-in-rape-case-must-pay-for-kid/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/man-acquitted-in-rape-case-must-pay-for-kid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MUMBAI: Nine years after a Wardha resident was acquitted of rape charges, the Bombay High Court, in a rare order, has asked him to shell out Rs 1,500 as monthly maintenance to the child who was born to the &#8216;victim&#8217;. Justice A P Bhangale upheld a sessions court order that as Sunil Katole (45) &#8220;was [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5084&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/man-acquitted-in-rape-case-must-pay-for-kid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide threats ground for divorce: SC</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/suicide-threats-ground-for-divorce-sc/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/suicide-threats-ground-for-divorce-sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW DELHI: Repeated threats to commit suicide is a ground for divorce, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday and dissolved the marriage of a couple from Punjab after the husband proved that he was traumatised by his wife&#8217;s incessant suicide threats. A bench of Justices P Sathasivam and B S Chauhan said: &#8220;Giving repeated threats [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5082&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/suicide-threats-ground-for-divorce-sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Sky is the limit of our power&#8230;.498A Case</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/sc-sky-is-the-limit-of-our-power-498a-case/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/sc-sky-is-the-limit-of-our-power-498a-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[498A Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A.Subash Babu vs State Of A.P.&#38; Anr on 21 July, 2011 Bench: J.M. Panchal, H.L. Gokhale IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1428 OF 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 6349 of 2010) A. Subash Babu &#8230; Petitioner(s) Versus State of A.P.&#38;amp; Anr. &#8230;Respondent(s) J U D G [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5080&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/sc-sky-is-the-limit-of-our-power-498a-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC: Merely because an order is purported to be made under a wrong provision of law, it does not become invalid so long as there is some other of law under which the order could be validly made.</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/hc-merely-because-an-order-is-purported-to-be-made-under-a-wrong-provision-of-law-it-does-not-become-invalid-so-long-as-there-is-some-other-of-law-under-which-the-order-could-be-validly-made/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/hc-merely-because-an-order-is-purported-to-be-made-under-a-wrong-provision-of-law-it-does-not-become-invalid-so-long-as-there-is-some-other-of-law-under-which-the-order-could-be-validly-made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DV Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Syed Naim S/O Syed Vajir vs Samina Syed Naim on 27 September, 2011 Bench: A. V. Potdar {1} CWP No.482/2011 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.482 OF 2011 Syed Naim s/o Syed Vajir PETITIONER Age-31 years, Occ-Private Service As a Driver, R/o Bank Colony, Parali [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5077&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/hc-merely-because-an-order-is-purported-to-be-made-under-a-wrong-provision-of-law-it-does-not-become-invalid-so-long-as-there-is-some-other-of-law-under-which-the-order-could-be-validly-made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NO need to prove Domestic relation or Domestic violence to get maintenance&#8230;..all you need to prove is husband&#8217;s Income</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/no-need-to-prove-domestic-relation-or-domestic-violence-to-get-maintenance-all-you-need-to-prove-is-husbands-income/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/no-need-to-prove-domestic-relation-or-domestic-violence-to-get-maintenance-all-you-need-to-prove-is-husbands-income/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DV Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shanker vs Meena on 20 September, 2011 Author: Suresh Kait $~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C.No.1814/2011 % Judgment delivered on:20th September,2011 SHANKER &#8230;.. Petitioner Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv versus MEENA &#8230;.. Respondent Through: Mr.Ashok Kumar &#38; Mr.R.M.Tatia, Advs. Inspector Jai Kishan Gautam, SHO police station Uttam Nagar in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5074&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/no-need-to-prove-domestic-relation-or-domestic-violence-to-get-maintenance-all-you-need-to-prove-is-husbands-income/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heavy misuse of 498A and DV Act&#8230;.Wife states in Dying declaration that she suffered inuries while cooking but husband arrested on a 15 days delayed FIR&#8230;Though granted Bail</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/heavy-misuse-of-498a-and-dv-act-wife-states-in-dying-declaration-that-she-suffered-inuries-while-cooking-but-husband-arrested-on-a-15-days-delayed-fir/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/heavy-misuse-of-498a-and-dv-act-wife-states-in-dying-declaration-that-she-suffered-inuries-while-cooking-but-husband-arrested-on-a-15-days-delayed-fir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[498A Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pravinbhai vs State on 21 September, 2011 Author: Abhilasha Kumari, Gujarat High Court Case Information System  CR.MA/186020/2009 6/ 6 ORDER  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD &#160; CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 1860 of 2009 ========================================================= &#160; PRAVINBHAI RAMANBHAI DEVIPUJAK &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus &#160; STATE OF GUJARAT &#8211; Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR CB DASTOOR [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5072&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/heavy-misuse-of-498a-and-dv-act-wife-states-in-dying-declaration-that-she-suffered-inuries-while-cooking-but-husband-arrested-on-a-15-days-delayed-fir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC: Marriage need not be proved to file DV, 11000 cost imposed on Husband</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/hc-marriage-need-not-be-proved-to-file-dv-11000-cost-imposed-on-husband/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/hc-marriage-need-not-be-proved-to-file-dv-11000-cost-imposed-on-husband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DV Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surender Pathak vs Maya Devi on 23 September, 2011 Author: Pradeep Nandrajog $~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 23rd September, 2011 + CRL.M.C. 1241/2010 SURENDER PATHAK &#8230;&#8230;Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajit Nair, Advocate. versus MAYA DEVI &#8230;.. Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5070&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/hc-marriage-need-not-be-proved-to-file-dv-11000-cost-imposed-on-husband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denying household resources is also domestic violence: HC</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/denying-household-resources-is-also-domestic-violence-hc/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/denying-household-resources-is-also-domestic-violence-hc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAGPUR: In an interesting verdict, Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court has ruled that continued deprivation of economic or financial resources to wife amounts to domestic violence. A single-judge bench of justice Ashok Bhangale pronounced this while dismissing a plea filed by Karim Khan, a resident of Buldhana, who challenged Khamgaon session court order convicting [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5059&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/denying-household-resources-is-also-domestic-violence-hc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC relief for in-laws in domestic violence case</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/hc-relief-for-in-laws-in-domestic-violence-case/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/hc-relief-for-in-laws-in-domestic-violence-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NAGPUR: The Nagpur bench of Bombay high court has stayed notice issued under Domestic Violence (DV) Act, 2005, by JMFC court against a couple accused of alleged ill-treatment of their daughter-in-law. Justice Prasanna Varale also issued a notice to daughter-in-law Mamta Pandey and Maharashtra government directing them to file a reply by September 29. Rajendra [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5057&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/hc-relief-for-in-laws-in-domestic-violence-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gujrat Family court passes divorce on the ground of &#8220;irretrievable break down of marriage&#8221; which is not a ground under HMA and only SC has such power under Article 142</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/gujrat-family-court-passes-divorce-on-the-ground-of-irretrievable-break-down-of-marriage-which-is-not-a-ground-under-hma-and-only-sc-has-such-power-under-article-142/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/gujrat-family-court-passes-divorce-on-the-ground-of-irretrievable-break-down-of-marriage-which-is-not-a-ground-under-hma-and-only-sc-has-such-power-under-article-142/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Binaben vs Kulinkumar on 7 September, 2011 Author: Harsha Devani, Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SA/185/2011 2/ 2 ORDER &#160; IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD &#160; &#160; SECOND APPEAL No. 185 of 2011 ========================================= &#160; BINABEN W/O KULINBHAI SHAH D/O SUNDERLAL SHAH &#8211; Appellant(s) Versus &#160; KULINKUMAR CHANDRAVADAN SHAH &#8211; [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5055&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/gujrat-family-court-passes-divorce-on-the-ground-of-irretrievable-break-down-of-marriage-which-is-not-a-ground-under-hma-and-only-sc-has-such-power-under-article-142/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens when husband takes back 498A wife? He gets 304B&#8230;Read this Judgement from HC</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/what-happens-when-husband-takes-back-498a-wife-he-gets-304b-read-this-judgement-from-hc/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/what-happens-when-husband-takes-back-498a-wife-he-gets-304b-read-this-judgement-from-hc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[498A Judgements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prem Singh &#38; Others vs State Of Uttaranchal on 13 September, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 260/2006 (Under Section 482 of the CrPC) Prem Singh &#38; Others &#8230;&#8230;.Applicants Versus State of Uttaranchal &#8230;&#8230;Respondent Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. P.S. Bohara, Brief Holder, for the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5053&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/what-happens-when-husband-takes-back-498a-wife-he-gets-304b-read-this-judgement-from-hc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allegations are highly exaggerated, 498A FIR quashed agaisnt all relative except husband</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/allegations-are-highly-exaggerated-498a-fir-quashed-agaisnt-all-relative-except-husband/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/allegations-are-highly-exaggerated-498a-fir-quashed-agaisnt-all-relative-except-husband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smt. Minakshi Bansal &#38; Others vs State Of Uttarakhand &#38; Another on 13 September, 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 84/2009 (Under Section 482 of the CrPC) Gopal Bansal &#38; Others &#8230;&#8230;.Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand &#38; Another &#8230;&#8230;Respondents With CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 65/2009 (Under Section 482 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5051&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/allegations-are-highly-exaggerated-498a-fir-quashed-agaisnt-all-relative-except-husband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wife appears party in person in HC but HC confirms Husband is the absolute owner of flat :)</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/wife-appears-party-in-person-in-hc-but-hc-confirms-husband-is-the-absolute-owner-of-flat/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/wife-appears-party-in-person-in-hc-but-hc-confirms-husband-is-the-absolute-owner-of-flat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judgement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anwar @ Arvind Ramkrishna &#8230; vs Shehnaz Sani on 16 September, 2011 Bench: A.M. Khanwilkar, R.Y. Ganoo 1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 131 of 2009 Anwar @ Arvind Ramkrishna Mudbhatkal Age 71 years, Indian Inhabitant, res. at A-702, Milton Apartments, Juhu Tara Road, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5049&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/wife-appears-party-in-person-in-hc-but-hc-confirms-husband-is-the-absolute-owner-of-flat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFHS Flash Dharna 17th September &#8211; 9-11 AM to protest against the 498A report by Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-flash-dharna-17th-september-9-11-am-to-protest-against-the-498a-report-by-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-flash-dharna-17th-september-9-11-am-to-protest-against-the-498a-report-by-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procession_Dharna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sanjevaani&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.NFHS Announces Flash Dharna&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Venue at Town Hall, Bangalore on 17-09-2011 Dharna starts @9.00 AM / Dharna ends @11.00 AM &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;All are invited to attend&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;   Rajya Sabha Press Release&#8212;-&#62; http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/rajya-sabha-press-release/   NFHS Press release&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#62; http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-strongly-opposes-one-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-regarding-498a-amendments/   NFHS Protest letter to Honorable Chairman of the Rajya Sabha&#8212;-&#62; http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/regarding-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-m-p/ Pictures shot at the venue&#8212;-&#62; https://picasaweb.google.com/117609073144184200949/NFHSDharnaOn17092011TownHallBangaloreToProtestOneHundredAndFortiethReportOnTheCom?authkey=Gv1sRgCMKp9dfx-r67gAE# https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.235702756481308.80968.124220007629584 Press [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5032&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-flash-dharna-17th-september-9-11-am-to-protest-against-the-498a-report-by-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/sanjevaani.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sanjevaani</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/eenadu-18-sep-2011.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">eenadu-18-sep-2011</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/vijayakarnataka-18-sep-2011.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">VijayaKarnataka-18-sep-2011</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://498amisuse.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/untitled.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Untitled</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajya Sabha press release</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/rajya-sabha-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/rajya-sabha-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Press release[1] Parliament of India (Rajya Sabha Secretariat) PRESS RELEASE Petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of   Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari,     M.P. presented its Hundred and Fortieth Report to the Rajya Sabha on 7th September, 2011 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5026&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/rajya-sabha-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regarding Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P.</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/regarding-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-m-p/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/regarding-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-m-p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8th July 2010/Bangalore To, Honorable Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Office of Chairman, Rajya Sabha,  Parliament House,New Delhi-110001 Subject: Regarding Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P. About National Family Harmony Society®: “National Family Harmony Society®” NFHS is a Non Governmental [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5024&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/regarding-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-m-p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFHS strongly opposes One Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, regarding 498A Amendments</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-strongly-opposes-one-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-regarding-498a-amendments/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-strongly-opposes-one-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-regarding-498a-amendments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press_release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Press Release Subject: NFHS strongly opposes One Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, regarding 498A Amendments About National Family Harmony Society®: “National Family Harmony Society®” NFHS is a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) promoting the cause of “family harmony” and “gender equality”. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5022&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-strongly-opposes-one-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-regarding-498a-amendments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manju slams ban, offers Nikita a role</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/manju-slams-ban-offers-nikita-a-role/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/manju-slams-ban-offers-nikita-a-role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 03:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BANGALORE: If one door closes, another opens. Actress Nikita can vouch for this. Criticizing the decision of the Karnataka Film Producers&#8217; Association, noted producer K Manju offered her the lead of the leading lady in his next film. &#8221;The association decision is wrong. If I&#8217;d been at the Sunday meeting, I&#8217;d have opposed it tooth [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5020&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/manju-slams-ban-offers-nikita-a-role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battered and bruised &#8212; 47 cases of domestic violence in July</title>
		<link>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/battered-and-bruised-47-cases-of-domestic-violence-in-july/</link>
		<comments>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/battered-and-bruised-47-cases-of-domestic-violence-in-july/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 03:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fighting Legal Terror</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/?p=5018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BANGALORE: The domestic violence that Darshan allegedly subjected his wife Vijayalakshmi to has hit the headlines all because the perpetrator is a famous film actor. But several other cases in the city just don&#8217;t make it into the public domain. Vanitha Sahaya Vani, the government-run helpline that offers free counselling and legal help for distressed [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=498amisuse.wordpress.com&amp;blog=10284410&amp;post=5018&amp;subd=498amisuse&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/battered-and-bruised-47-cases-of-domestic-violence-in-july/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f7af5f72a138f499081f9d9104f3816e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">498amisuse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
