Archive

Archive for September 14, 2011

NFHS Flash Dharna 17th September – 9-11 AM to protest against the 498A report by Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh

September 14, 2011 2 comments

sanjevaani……………………………………….NFHS Announces Flash Dharna……………………………………….

Venue at Town Hall, Bangalore on 17-09-2011

Dharna starts @9.00 AM / Dharna ends @11.00 AM

………………………………………………All are invited to attend……………………………………………

 

Rajya Sabha Press Release—->

http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/rajya-sabha-press-release/

 

NFHS Press release——————>

http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/nfhs-strongly-opposes-one-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-regarding-498a-amendments/

 

NFHS Protest letter to Honorable Chairman of the Rajya Sabha—->

http://498amisuse.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/regarding-hundred-and-fortieth-report-on-the-committee-on-petitions-of-rajya-sabha-under-the-chairmanship-of-shri-bhagat-singh-koshyari-m-p/

Pictures shot at the venue—->

https://picasaweb.google.com/117609073144184200949/NFHSDharnaOn17092011TownHallBangaloreToProtestOneHundredAndFortiethReportOnTheCom?authkey=Gv1sRgCMKp9dfx-r67gAE#

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.235702756481308.80968.124220007629584

Press coverage—->SanJevaani

Press coverage—->Eenadu-18-Sep-2011

eenadu-18-sep-2011.pdf

 

Press coverage—->VijayaKarnataka-18-Sep-2011

Categories: Procession_Dharna

Rajya Sabha press release

September 14, 2011 1 comment

Press release[1]

Parliament of India

(Rajya Sabha Secretariat)

PRESS RELEASE

Petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860

The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of

 

Shri Bhagat Singh

Koshyari,

 

 

M.P. presented its Hundred and Fortieth Report to the Rajya Sabha on 7th

September, 2011

on the

 

 

petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Petition

was submitted by Dr. Anupama Singh, a resident of New Delhi.

 

2. The petitioner has raised her concern about the misuse of the Section 498A, IPC, which was

 

inserted in Indian Penal Code, 1860 way back in 1983 to protect married women from dowry harassment

 

in their matrimonial home. The offence under Section 498A IPC being cognizable, non-bailable and noncompoundable

 

gives power to the Investigating Officers in police stations to arrest the husband and his

 

relatives whose names are mentioned in the First Information Report (FIR) by the woman or her family.

 

The petitioner has prayed to make the law bailable and compoundable; and also for provision of stringent

 

punishment for abusers of Section 498A of IPC.

 

3. The Committee while formulating its observations/recommendations, has relied on the written

 

comments of the concerned Ministries, National Commission for Women and National Commission for

 

Protection of Child Rights, oral evidence of witnesses- official as well as non-official, feedback received in

 

response to the Press Release, observations of the Members of the Committee and interaction with others.

 

 

Important recommendations of the Committee:-

A. Making offence under Section 498A bailable and non-cognizable:-

Having gone through the evidence produced before it by different stakeholders, the Committee

finds it difficult to give a straight answer to the request made in the petition in terms of yes or no. The

petitioner and the stakeholders who have come up in favour of the petition have vehemently protested

against the misuse of the provisions of Section 498A IPC. But the Committee is unable to oversee the

inputs it has received from the Ministry of Woman and Child Development, the National Commission for

Women, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and other organisations that have pleaded

before the Committee against the petition.

 

The fact that offence under Section 498A of IPC is

cognizable and non-bailable is acting as a big deterrent in the society. In the opinion of the

 

Committee, this historic step has succeeded in containing the magnitude of crime against

 

women in the country. Therefore, the Committee is unable to agree to the petition in so far as

 

categorising the offence under Section 498A IPC as non-cognizable and bailable is concerned.

 

The Committee recommends that the offence under Section 498A of IPC may continue to

 

remain cognizable and non-bailable as any change in the law at this stage might go against the

 

interest of the women community in general. The Committee fears that any interference in the

 

present law might reverse the social protection of women in their matrimonial home that has

 

been built up so far.

 

 

(Para 13.1 of the Report)

B. Making the offence under Section 498A, IPC compoundable:

The Committee notes that the offence under Section 498A, IPC is essentially fallout of

strained matrimonial relationship for which there might be various considerations. Since there

can be various causes leading to an offence under Section 498A, IPC and parties to the

marriage could be responsible for the same in varying degrees, it would be appropriate if the

remedy of compromise is kept open to settle a matrimonial dispute. The Committee, therefore,

recommends to the Government to consider whether the offence under Section 498A, IPC can

be made compoundable.

(Para 13.2 of the Report)

Having recommended that the offence under Section 498A of IPC should continue to be

cognizable and non-bailable, the Committee strongly recommends that the ill-effects and

misuse of the present legal provisions is also checked. The Committee fears that failure to do

so might leave no option except to dilute the law by making the same non-cognizable and

bailable. In this context, the Committee recommends certain additional measures as contained

in the succeeding paragraphs.

2

(Para 13.3 of the Report)

C. Power to arrest:

As a first step to check misuse of provisions of Section 498A IPC, the Committee recommends that

the provisions of Section 498A, IPC should be suitably modified so as to define the term ‘relative’ which

may exclude the arrest of small children and very elderly people and also distantly related persons who

might not have a role in the commission of offence. Secondly, the Committee would very much like to see

that the powers of arrest on such complaints are exercised carefully and cautiously.

 

The Committee

notes that advisories have been issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs to all State

 

Governments/ UT Administrations for preventing the misuse of Section 498A, IPC. The

 

Committee would like these guidelines to be followed and implemented strictly in letter and

 

spirit by the State Governments/UT Administrations. The Committee further recommends that

 

these guidelines should be adequately published by the State Governments/UT Administrations

 

and displayed publically in police stations so that the public is aware of their rights/liabilities

 

and is not harassed on account of ignorance of law.

 

 

(Para 13.4 of the Report)

The Committee recommends that arrests under Section 498A, IPC should be done only with the

written orders of the police officer of the level of DCP or equivalent and for acceptable reasons.

(Para 13.5 of the Report)

D. Counseling and Mediation:

The Committee recommends that adequate provisions may be introduced in Section 498A to make

the process of counseling compulsory before any arrests are made. The Committee further advocates that

professional and trained family counselors should do the counseling in the Women’s Cell so that frivolous

cases are screened at the initial stage itself and Section 498A is invoked in rare cases.

 

The Committee

also recommends that the process of counseling which is being handled by the Police

 

Department should be developed professionally by involving qualified counselors and reputed

 

NGOs so that people have more confidence in the mechanism and they could be approached for

 

intervention timely and arrive at some settlement without reaching the stage of complaint

 

under Section 498A, IPC.

 

 

(Para 13.6 of the Report)

E. Check on false complaints:

The Committee feels that the Government should consider providing legal remedies for preventing

filing of false complaints or complaints with ulterior motive to harass the husband and his relatives under

Section 498A.

 

The Committee recommends that Section 498A be amended so as to provide for

specific penalty in case the complaint is found to be false or with some other ulterior motive.

 

 

(Para 13.8 of the Report)

F. Dowry and Registration of Marriage:

The Committee is of the considered view that a strong and effective anti dowry law can go along

way in curbing matrimonial disputes.

 

Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the existing

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 may be strengthened so that no dowry is given in marriage and

 

whatever gifts are exchanged in the marriage are listed out and acknowledged by the parties

 

to the marriage in writing. The Committee feels that such a step by the Government would

 

curb the dowry related matrimonial disputes which are substantial portion of the whole lot of

 

disputes

 

 

 

.

 

(Para 13.10 of the Report)

G. Juvenile in conflict with law (Section 498A, IPC):

The Committee also recommends that there is a need to ensure that provision of Section

498A should not be invoked in case of juveniles. However in case of any aberrations, the police

must ensure that the children are put under the care of Child Welfare Committee which would

arrange for counseling and interim care of the children in child friendly environment.

(Para 13.12 of the Report)

3

Categories: Other news

Regarding Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P.

September 14, 2011 1 comment

8th July 2010/Bangalore

To,

Honorable Chairman of the Rajya Sabha,

Office of Chairman, Rajya Sabha,  Parliament House,New Delhi-110001

Subject: Regarding Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P.

About National Family Harmony Society®: “National Family Harmony Society® NFHS is a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) promoting the cause of “family harmony” and “gender equality”. It is registered under “The Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960” and is based in Bangalore. We have branches in more than 16 states and in abroad too. We have approximately 16500 members all over India. To know more about us please visit www.family-harmony.org / www.498a.org.in.

The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P. presented its Hundred and Fortieth Report to the Rajya Sabha on 7th September, 2011 on the petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Petition was submitted by Dr. Anupama Singh, a resident of New Delhi.

 

The committee has given some recommendations to Rajya Sabha regarding 498A IPC. Before discussing merits or demerits or expressing our opinion on them, we would like to present different perspective of this issue because the committee has deliberated and recommended some ways and methods to “Stop the misuse of 498A IPC”.

 

There may not be difference of opinion in this country if the subject matter to be discussed is “protection of women”. No doubt, 498A IPC was framed to prevent cruelty on women and act as a deterrent against cruelty on women. If that is the case then the petition is submitted by Dr Anupama Singh who herself is women. The fact that the law has failed and has not solved its purpose and has been seriously misused and abused by greedy women to settle score with husband and his family members is not in dispute.

 

The problem is the committee has given a very technical and legal opinion to an issue which is entirely social and matrimonial in nature and has limited its scope of discussion. E.g.

In the para 13.8 of the report the committee acknowledges that measures are required to “check on false complaints”. The committee recommends that “The Committee feels that the Government should consider providing legal remedies for preventing filing of false complaints or complaints with ulterior motive to harass the husband and his relatives under Section 498A. The Committee recommends that Section 498A be amended so as to provide for specific penalty in case the complaint is found to be false or with some other ulterior motive.”

 

So when the misuse and abuse of the law is very clear and it is acknowledged that husbands and their family members are also victims of violence, cruelty and false cases then the scope of the discussion should not be limited to “Stop the abuse the 498A IPC”. The larger issue is “Abuse and misuse of Gender biased laws” and “Protection to husband and his family members”.

 

There are many laws and Acts to deal with matrimonial disputes and most of them are NOT “Gender Neutral”. Some of them are 498A IPC, Protection of women from domestic violence Act, 125 of CrPC, Hindu marriage Act, Hindu adoption and succession Act, Guardian and wards Act etc. All these Acts and IPC/CrPC section deals with “Protection to women”, “Alimony and maintenance to women”, “Divorce and child custody” etc. It is well known that all these laws are being heavily misused by greedy women to settle score and to harass the husbands and his family members.

 

The argument of women faces e.g. that of Ex-WCD minister Smt Renuka Chowdry that “women has been suffering from ages and now it is the turn of MEN to suffer” (In one of her TV interviews) OR that “Abuse and misuse is in small number so it is ok” OR to say that “Any law for that matter is being misused” has only aggravated the issue.

 

Unless the government looks at the this grave issue in its entirety and makes serious attempt to solve it by simplifying the laws rather than duplicating the laws this issue will never be solved. We think now the time has come so that Government should look at the larger issue wrt the matrimonial disputes. In view of the above discussion we strongly oppose the report which is nothing but half hearted attempt by Government which is not going to solve the issue. Hence we demand following.

 

  • Misuse and abuse of Laws: Heavy punishment by the way of imprisonment should be introduced in case of misuse of any matrimonial laws.
  • Make matrimonial disputes “Gender biased”. Government is completely ignoring the pain, harassment and torture of husband and his family’s members which they suffer at the hands of greedy women. Thousands of husbands have got divorce from wife on the ground of cruelty. This proves that women also can be cruel. Hence matrimonial laws should be made “Gender neutral” to provide protection to husbands and his family members.
  • Duplication of Laws: Just to deal with the maintenance for wife there are 6 different laws. This is due to the mindset of our law makers to make a new law if there is complaint regarding old law. When Hindu marriage act was already there to deal with the maintenance of the wife then there was no need to bring CrPC 125, or Domestic violence act or HAMA.
  • The definition of women is “Newly married young women”: Even though it is matter of common knowledge that daughter-in-law’s treat their mother-in-law with cruelty even then “Matrimonial laws” are only meant for “Newly married young women”. This must be amended to given protection to all without any consideration of gender or age.
  • Protection to Husband and his families: Currently Husband and his family members do not have any protection from the cruelty of daughter-in-law. Laws should be made gender-neutral for their protection.
  • Child custody issues: Government should bring in amendment for “Shared Parenting”.
  • Never ending litigations: The litigations are so lengthy that by the time a father files for child custody and by the time matter is decided by Supreme Court, the child is ready to have his own child. And similarly once a divorce is filed by spouse, and by the time Supreme Court decides it couple are at the verge of retirement. The litigation in case of matrimonial disputes should be finished in a time bound manner of 1 year.
  • Simplification of Divorce laws: What the relatives and the social circle cannot achieve is sought to be achieved that too by an over burdened presiding officer. Divorces are denied in a routine manner even when criminal cases are pending. Law should be modified keeping in mind the changed social structure.
  • Try all matrimonial disputes under civil law: Involvement of police breaks any possibility of re-union between the couple.

 

Attempt by Government to do some temporary, ad-hoc and stop-gap arrangement by fixing some loop holes in the 498A IPC is neither going to stop the misuse of “Gender biased” laws nor it is going to provide any “protection to husband and his family members” from potential misuse and abuse of law. Government instead of taking ad-hoc and temporary steps should constitute a committee for overhaul of overall matrimonial laws rather than approaching the issue piecemeal basis which will aggravate the issue rather than solving it.  

 

 

 

 

P Suresh, President

9880141531

 

Categories: Parliament

NFHS strongly opposes One Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, regarding 498A Amendments

September 14, 2011 2 comments

Press Release

Subject: NFHS strongly opposes One Hundred and Fortieth Report on the Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, regarding 498A Amendments

About National Family Harmony Society®: “National Family Harmony Society® NFHS is a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) promoting the cause of “family harmony” and “gender equality”. It is registered under “The Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960” and is based in Bangalore. We have branches in more than 16 states and in abroad too. We have approximately 16500 members all over India. To know more about us please visit www.family-harmony.org / www.498a.org.in.

The Committee on Petitions of Rajya Sabha under the Chairmanship of Shri Bhagat Singh Koshyari, M.P. presented its Hundred and Fortieth Report to the Rajya Sabha on 7th September, 2011 on the petition praying for amendments in Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Petition was submitted by Dr. Anupama Singh, a resident of New Delhi.

The committee has given some recommendations to Rajya Sabha regarding 498A IPC. Before discussing merits or demerits or expressing our opinion on them, we would like to present different perspective of this issue because the committee has deliberated and recommended some ways and methods to “Stop the misuse of 498A IPC”.

 

There may not be difference of opinion in this country if the subject matter to be discussed is “protection of women”. No doubt, 498A IPC was framed to prevent cruelty on women and act as a deterrent against cruelty on women. If that is the case then the petition is submitted by Dr Anupama Singh who herself is women. The fact that the law has failed and has not solved its purpose and has been seriously misused and abused by greedy women to settle score with husband and his family members is not in dispute.

 

The problem is the committee has given a very technical and legal opinion to an issue which is entirely social and matrimonial in nature and has limited its scope of discussion. E.g.

In the para 13.8 of the report the committee acknowledges that measures are required to “check on false complaints”. The committee recommends that “The Committee feels that the Government should consider providing legal remedies for preventing filing of false complaints or complaints with ulterior motive to harass the husband and his relatives under Section 498A. The Committee recommends that Section 498A be amended so as to provide for specific penalty in case the complaint is found to be false or with some other ulterior motive.”

So when the misuse and abuse of the law is very clear and it is acknowledged that husbands and their family members are also victims of violence, cruelty and false cases then the scope of the discussion should not be limited to “Stop the abuse the 498A IPC”. The larger issue is “Abuse and misuse of Gender biased laws” and “Protection to husband and his family members”.

 

There are many laws and Acts to deal with matrimonial disputes and most of them are NOT “Gender Neutral”. Some of them are 498A IPC, Protection of women from domestic violence Act, 125 of CrPC, Hindu marriage Act, Hindu adoption and succession Act, Guardian and wards Act etc. All these Acts and IPC/CrPC section deals with “Protection to women”, “Alimony and maintenance to women”, “Divorce and child custody” etc. It is well known that all these laws are being heavily misused by greedy women to settle score and to harass the husbands and his family members.

 

The argument of women faces e.g. that of Ex-WCD minister Smt Renuka Chowdry that “women has been suffering from ages and now it is the turn of MEN to suffer” (In one of her TV interviews) OR that “Abuse and misuse is in small number so it is ok” OR to say that “Any law for that matter is being misused” has only aggravated the issue.

 

Unless the government looks at the this grave issue in its entirety and makes serious attempt to solve it by simplifying the laws rather than duplicating the laws this issue will never be solved. We think now the time has come so that Government should look at the larger issue wrt the matrimonial disputes. In view of the above discussion we strongly oppose the report which is nothing but half hearted attempt by Government which is not going to solve the issue. Hence we demand following.

 

  • Misuse and abuse of Laws: Heavy punishment by the way of imprisonment should be introduced in case of misuse of any matrimonial laws.
  • Make matrimonial disputes “Gender biased”. Government is completely ignoring the pain, harassment and torture of husband and his family’s members which they suffer at the hands of greedy women. Thousands of husbands have got divorce from wife on the ground of cruelty. This proves that women also can be cruel. Hence matrimonial laws should be made “Gender neutral” to provide protection to husbands and his family members.
  • Duplication of Laws: Just to deal with the maintenance for wife there are 6 different laws. This is due to the mindset of our law makers to make a new law if there is complaint regarding old law. When Hindu marriage act was already there to deal with the maintenance of the wife then there was no need to bring CrPC 125, or Domestic violence act or HAMA.
  • The definition of women is “Newly married young women”: Even though it is matter of common knowledge that daughter-in-law’s treat their mother-in-law with cruelty even then “Matrimonial laws” are only meant for “Newly married young women”. This must be amended to given protection to all without any consideration of gender or age.
  • Protection to Husband and his families: Currently Husband and his family members do not have any protection from the cruelty of daughter-in-law. Laws should be made gender-neutral for their protection.
  • Child custody issues: Government should bring in amendment for “Shared Parenting”.
  • Never ending litigations: The litigations are so lengthy that by the time a father files for child custody and by the time matter is decided by Supreme Court, the child is ready to have his own child. And similarly once a divorce is filed by spouse, and by the time Supreme Court decides it couple are at the verge of retirement. The litigation in case of matrimonial disputes should be finished in a time bound manner of 1 year.
  • Simplification of Divorce laws: What the relatives and the social circle cannot achieve is sought to be achieved that too by an over burdened presiding officer. Divorces are denied in a routine manner even when criminal cases are pending. Law should be modified keeping in mind the changed social structure.
  • Try all matrimonial disputes under civil law: Involvement of police breaks any possibility of re-union between the couple.

 

Attempt by Government to do some temporary, ad-hoc and stop-gap arrangement by fixing some loop holes in the 498A IPC is neither going to stop the misuse of “Gender biased” laws nor it is going to provide any “protection to husband and his family members” from potential misuse and abuse of law. Government instead of taking ad-hoc and temporary steps should constitute a committee for overhaul of overall matrimonial laws rather than approaching the issue piecemeal basis which will aggravate the issue rather than solving it.   

P Suresh, President,                                                                M Mahesh, General Secretary,

9880141531                                                                               9731569970

Categories: Press_release